I'm looking for Flex or AIR jobs right now.

If you have troubles in your project or you need good Flex developer, I could help you. So please contact me.


Best Regards

Shigeru Nakagaki

Order By Date

24th, Thu. June, From 18:00 At Osaki, Tokyo
  Sponsors : Tokyo Flex User Group, Adobe Japan
  Place : Ohsaki Gate City Holl
  FlashCatalyst
  Flex 4, Flash Builder (aka FlexBuilder)
  ColdFusion 9, ColdFusion Builder
  LiveCycle Data Service 3
  event details

4th, Sat. July, From 15:00 At Hokuriku area
  Sponsor : Hokuriku Flex User Group
  Place : Toyama city, Toyama
  event details

7th, Tue. July, From 13:30 At Osaki, Tokyo
  Sponsor : Adobe Japan Official Beta Event
      A Platform Evangelist will talk
  Place : Ohsaki Gate City Holl
  Flash Platform
  FlashCatalyst
  Flex 4, Flash Builder (aka FlexBuilder)
  event details

9th, Thu. July, From 19:00 At Shinsaibashi, Osaka
  Sponsors : Osaka Flex User Group, Adobe Japan
      A Platform Evangelist will talk
  Place : Live and Bar 11
  Flash Platform
  FlashCatalyst
  Flex 4, Flash Builder (aka FlexBuilder)
  event details


Come and Get the latest information!

Here are three samples.

RoMLeakTest 1
RoMLeakTest 2
RoMLeakTest 3

RoMLeakTest 1 doesn't cause memory leak. I checked this with FlexBuilder profiler. When I clicked "Garbage Collector", the memory use was reduced.

RoMLeakTest 2 cause memory leak. Instances of NetConnectionMessageResponder class became zero, but the memory wasn't reduced. And I clicked "Garbage Collector", but the memory uses didn't change.

In RoMLeakTest 3, it deletes listener functions of RemoteObject. But it didn't matter. The situation was same as RoMLeakTest 2.

Is this a bug?? Or Is my code wrong??

What do you think, guys??

Updated : 2009/02/06
Sorry, URL of sample2 and sample 3 were wrong. I fixed it.
And I posted this issue to Flex bugbase as SDK-19087

Congratulations on AIR 1.1 release!!

We can build AIR 1.1 application with Flex SDK 3.0.2.

BTW, I tried framework cache with Flex SDK 3.0.2. But I failed. It said mismatch version. Yeh, because SWZ file is still framework_3.0.0.477.swz although actual framework is 3.0.2.


When is the major milestone updated to 3.0.2 or later?